Search for: "In re Application of Johns"
Results 301 - 320
of 6,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2018, 8:29 am
Therefore, evidence showing only that the source of one product may not be the source of another product does not aid applicant in its attempt to rebut the evidence of the examining attorney.And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:16 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:12 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:19 am
Applicant appealed. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:44 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:08 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 2:47 am
Because issues of doubt should be resolved in favor of the applicant (In re Benthin Mgmt. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:25 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:04 am
In re Joseph E. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:07 am
In re Caliburger, Serial No. 85810919 (November 12, 2015) [not precedential].Applicant did not dispute that “Cali” means California, or that a “California-style burger” is a type of burger. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 3:32 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 3:10 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:01 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 1:41 pm
Copyright © 2010 by John M. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:41 am
"The Board therefore affirmed the refusals.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm
In re John Michael Brack – Details Matter At issue in this ex parte appeal was Mr. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
In re John Michael Brack – Details Matter At issue in this ex parte appeal was Mr. [read post]
