Search for: "In re Conrad "
Results 301 - 320
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
And where do you think they’re coming from? [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:27 pm
--Rick Klau Product Manager, Blogger rklau@google.com http://tins.rklau.com/Other comments indicate that Conrad's comparison is further flawed; Kevin O'Keefe took issue with some of the claims about LexBlog, Rex Gradeless pointed out that Wordpress.com isn't as limited as Conrad claimed, and Doug Cornelius suggested that self-hosted WordPress deserved a look too. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:31 pm
Now they're joined by another. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
Oh, Lake, you’re as stubborn as an ox! [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:14 pm
Conrad Black’s attorneys asked and received permission from Stevens to file a reply to the government; it is due by noon Wednesday. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:13 am
Whether they're looking for another view on a general issue of law, suggestions of best practices or insights into a vendor, in-house lawyers can find a powerful tool in social networks tailored to their needs. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
The Invitation: You're Invited! [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:44 am
Today in Corporations we covered the Conrad Black scandal.1 Black was a media baron until his fraud conviction for bad behavior1 as head of Hollinger International Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:24 am
"The federal government agreed that the new administration needs time to rethink mandatory E-Verify use, particularly in light of the stressed economy," said Robin Conrad, executive vice president of the National Chamber Litigation Center, in a statement. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:50 am
To the extent that the action occurs outdoors or away from England it is largely in flashback, being related to Smiley, or Smiley's own recollections, being re-shuffled and re-connected with other bits of information. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
That's just a very hard sell to our people when they're hurting. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
Failure to convert a prior instrument is not a re-opener under Act 2. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:47 am
" In other words, Republicans are threatening a filibuster of judges if they're not happy. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" TTABlog comment: Maybe you're wondering, what about the mark FIRST BEST PLACE? [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
Yeah, it makes you wonder if they’re serious about ethics . . . . [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:54 pm
I suggested that the commission should radically de-emphasize its efforts to control judicial discretion and should re-fashion its role as a source of study and information about sentencing practices, both federal and state. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:10 pm
And I figure, okay if they paid a criminal penalty, they must have pled guilty.No, they did not plead guilty.Okay, they must have been charged with a crime and had the prosecution deferred.No, they were not charged with a crime and did not have the prosecution deferred.About a week later, after pounding the Justice Department for an answer as to what happened to Boeing, they sent over something called a non prosecution agreement.That is where the Justice Department says - we're going… [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:39 am
According to the Dodd Clock we’re at Day 182. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:01 am
McDonald (In re World Health Alternatives, Inc.), 385 B.R. 576 (Bankr. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:00 am
Again, from the WBJ article: Robin Conrad, executive vice president of the National Chamber Litigation Center, said the delay in the rule’s effective date will give the new Obama administration “an opportunity to re-evaluate the efficacy of the policy. [read post]
