Search for: "In re GARLAND"
Results 301 - 320
of 813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2023, 12:45 pm
As always, I respect your views, but, in my book, the Trump indictment by the Joe Biden-Merrick Garland-Jack Smith Justice Department is a complete travesty. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
" In In re Baylor Medical Center at Garland (No. 06-0491) (orig. proceeding), the Texas Supreme Court overruled case law effectively holding—based on a now-repealed procedural rule provision—that a trial court could not vacate an order granting a new trial more than 75 days after the order was signed. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 6:50 am
Movie: Ex Machina (Directed by Alex Garland) Quote: Dick, you’re fired. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:04 pm
Garland in D.C. or Judge Alex Kozinski on the 9th Circuit, you’re in luck! [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 9:32 am
Yesterday's argument in Garland v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 2:49 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:22 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 3:20 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
Five new grants; a remand in the interest of justice; more on contractual subrogation [May 28, 2010]
28 May 2010, 7:51 am
But during the pendency of the appeal, the Texas Supreme Court changed course, announcing the opposite rule in In re Baylor Medical Center at Garland. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:03 am
Make sure you’re ready in case of an emergency. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 7:02 pm
No, for the same reason that the Senate had no obligation to give Merrick Garland a hearing. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm
If we’re not in Turner world, where exactly are we? [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:59 am
If you’re prone to headaches, do not read it. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Jeanne Shaheen, among others, similarly cited the oath in their comments on Garland. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Garland BK 599/1 44 6/22/23 21-1484 Arizona v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
” Wired magazine called it "the most significant privacy decision in the digital age " This doctrine doesn't yet apply on the Texas border (we're in the Fifth Circuit), but clearly the feds must re-think the policy at least in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:16 am
" Rather, it is to un-do the Republicans' theft of the Garland seat. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Garland BK 599/1 44 6/22/23 21-1484 Arizona v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Attorney Generals, such as the ones Donald Trump might appoint, if he is re-elected in 2024, to be able to pick any tough thug lawyer off the street and empower him in the way Attorney General Merrick Garland has empowered private citizen Jack Smith. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm
Colleen Roh (Harvard 2010 / Garland) 2. [read post]
