Search for: "In re GARLAND"
Results 301 - 320
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2021, 12:01 pm
Bastide-Hernandez was later prosecuted for illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 USC § 1326, based on this removal. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 10:41 am
Without it, we’re all at risk of exploitation—by authoritarian governments, over-reaching police, nosy corporations, and online criminals. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Until then, federal cases should be subject to immediate re-negotiation: cases should now be re-evaluated under A.G. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:37 am
The kind of pardon we’re talking about should cover only federal crimes that Trump committed in his capacity as president. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
For now, we’re going to focus on more broadly-applicable statutes. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 8:16 am
More Best Re-Read: I rarely re-read books, in large part because I’ve been disappointed that books I once loved often no longer appeal to me. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
But I also think that the absence of SCOTUS in the musical gave birth to some fan fiction in the book (and if you’re into fan fiction, Rebecca Tushnet has lots to say in the book about the genre). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
claimed that the Republican Senate majority is “doing the exact opposite of what it promised four years ago” when it refused to hold hearings for President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Merrick Garland, about 80 days prior to the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
[A future message from the Biden-Harris Transition Team. ] From: The Biden-Harris Transition Team To: Bipartisan Constitutional Scholars Date: November 4, 2020 Re: The Garland Commission President-Elect Biden is honored to invite you to join the Biden-Harris Transition Team. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
And they have an easier starting point, since Republicans have in fact played some amazing hardball of late; just ask Justice Garland. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:54 am
Either you’re for them or you’re not, and if you’re for them, then you’re for all of them and expect the law to respect the ones you prefer as well as the ones you don’t. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 3:45 am
Yes, the Republicans’ refusal to give Judge Merrick Garland a vote was disgraceful, as was the Democrats’ treatment of Justice Kavanaugh. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 7:35 am
Note that had such rules been in place, the Senate would have considered President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court, and he would likely have been confirmed. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:27 am
As criminal defense lawyers, we’re painfully aware that many, perhaps most, of our cases are lost causes. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 3:50 pm
You're voting now. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:35 am
People like Merrick Garland, for instance. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
But we’re still at the starting gate of this battle, even as the soothsayers have already condemned her for reversing Roe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 6:34 pm
That was a beautifully sunny March day, but the weather couldn’t help Garland’s nomination. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 9:12 am
Then-sPresident Barack Obama had nominated Judge Merrick Garland to replace Scalia, but Senate Republicans had refused to hold hearings or a vote. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
