Search for: "In re Jacob B."
Results 301 - 314
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
Among the speakers was Lord Justice Jacob, who gave a paper entitled "The Judge's Perspective", the subject of the perspective being the resolution of Europe's horrendous patent litigation problems.It is rare for the IPKat to post an entire document of this length; it is even rarer for the Kat to withhold his comments. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Therefore no interim injunction should be granted because B had not shown that it was more likely to succeed than not. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 11:25 am
Krauser, a judge of the Circuit Court of Maryland, and the Honorable Peter B. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Justice Mummery, Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Jacob) has given its ruling today in Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV, Information Management Consultancy Limited (t/a Responsive Designs and/or Tapis UK) and B&Q plc [2007] EWCA Civ 364. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 6:15 am
I ask his opinion of it on several dimensions: Re the impact it had on his own practice: "Great! [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:29 am
Well, here's the text of the reply by President Pompidou (right) of Epoland to Lord Justice Jacob (with the sincere bits at the end omitted).Re Court of Appeal Judgment [2006] EWCA Civ 1371Dear Lord Justice Jacob,I am writing to you to let you know that the above-mentioned decision has led to a discussion within the EPO as to the possibility of referring questions regarding the exclusions to patentability set out in Article 52(2) EPC to the Enlarged board of Appeal.On… [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
André and David B. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 10:31 am
Rogers College of Law Jack B. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
JOHNSON, Judge, ARLENE JOHNSON, Judge, DAVID B. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 1:41 am
See In re Gaylord Container Corp. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:52 am
Jacobs, 298 F.2d 469, 472 (4th Cir.1961) (suggesting that sua sponte relief may be appropriate under Rule 60(b) in some cases).FN3. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:52 am
Vice Chancellor Strine joined the issue in In re Gaylord Container Corp. in 2000. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:49 pm
The application was published in 1996, and Remington opposed it under ss.3(1)(a) and (b), 3(2) and 3(3).Once Jacob J found the mark to be invalid, Remington argued that for Philips to continue to resist the opposition on the 3D mark was res judicata, and hence an abuse of process. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 12:41 pm
The matter wals delat with together with another case in re Aerotel. [read post]
