Search for: "In re Peter L." Results 301 - 320 of 1,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2019, 11:57 pm
Never Too Late 232 [Week ending 1st September] Board of EUIPO says re-filing of Monopoly’ as EUTM is invalid due to bad-faith | Can the ideal image of female beauty be considered a limit to a designer’s freedom? [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:14 am
In re Striker Brands LLC, Serial No. 87552915 (August 23, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps surprising: There’s no formal deference at PTO to int’l bodies and their naming of generics: WHO int’l nonproprietary names & US adopted names council. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Thorsten Bausch
What has interested me for this blog is how the European standard for re-establishment, i.e. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 7:54 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” 3 Ideas To Future-Proof Your Law Firm – Nicole L. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:33 am
In re International Barrel Distributors, Serial No. 87271602 (June 28, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
San Diego County health officials announced late Friday night that a 2-year-old child has died and three other children between 2 and 13 years old have become ill after having contact with animals at the San Diego County Fair. [read post]
30 May 2019, 3:28 am
In re Talyoni, LLC, Serial No. 87695323 (May 28, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:45 am by Jason Kilborn
If you're interested in participating and/or presenting in May of next year, please let me know, and I'll coordinate and pass on the info to the organizers. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am by Grégoire Desrousseaux
Article 122 of the PACTE bill proposes to extend the grounds for rejection 4°, 5° and 7° of Article L. 612-12 as follows: (4°)     its subject matter is not patentable pursuant to Articles L. 611-16 to L. 611-19[9]; (5°)     its subject matter cannot be considered as an “invention” within the meaning of paragraph 2 of Article L. 611-10 (discoveries, aesthetic creations, etc.)[10]; and… [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Katfriend, Léon Dijkman, reports on the decision in Philips v ASUS from the Dutch Court of Appeal - the first Dutch decision after Huawei v ZTE dealing with a FRAND-defence. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Barclay, First Amendment Categories of Harm, (95 Indiana Law Journal (2020 Forthcoming)).Paul Horwitz, A Close Reading of Barnette, in Honor of Vincent Blasi, (13 FIU L. [read post]