Search for: "In re Robert S. et al." Results 301 - 320 of 592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2013, 6:12 am by Derek Muller
Sisk-Leiter Scholarly Impact Study: Formally Sisk et al. at the University of St. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Here, Muller et al. have created an excellent book with wide-reaching appeal whose focal point and strength are Bill Manbo's photographs. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm by The JAG HUNTER
It backfired because Morsi’s Al Qaeda pals and affiliates in Benghazi went rogue on him. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
Geithner, et al., a petition to review a decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
My book also features a slashing constitutional critique of the exclusionary rule, placing my views in line with — actually to the right of — Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas Alito, and opposed to the views typically championed by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer (and before them, Justices Stevens, Souter, Brennan, Marshall, et al.). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:37 am by Justin Levitt
  But Robert Erickson and Lori Minnite have written what’s still the best explanation around for why it’s statistically troublesome to assert that the existing studies (including the ones that Nate used as a baseline) can accurately assess the impact of turnout. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 8:30 pm by My name
The worst case for us is stability, and we’re in year three of stability right now,” explained Daniel F. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Fox Television Stations, et al., 10-1293). [read post]