Search for: "In re Walt Disney"
Results 301 - 316
of 316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
The Walt Disney Corporation, 83 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 1996), involves the initial publication in Germany in 1923 of the classic children's tale "Bambi, A Life in the Woods" without a US copyright notice.The second, Blanch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 12:45 am
If we're right about that -- are we? [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 7:36 am
Walt must be spinning in his grave. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:43 pm
Those members include the Recording Industry Association of America, the Association of American Publishers, the Motion Picture Association of America, Microsoft, Viacom and Walt Disney. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
In fact I feel certain that very few people in the park that day gave a passing thought to Michael Ovitz and a case called In re Walt Disney. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 pm
Tamar Frankel has a new paper posted to SSRN that offers a provocative take on the Delaware supreme court's decision in the Walt Disney case:In In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:00 am
In In re the Walt Disney Co. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 10:59 pm
My only prior encounter with this has been in several Delaware cases, including In re Limited Inc. and In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:25 pm
"Astronaut wannabes" can experience the thrill of a simulated launch into deep space -- at the Walt Disney World (Epcot) attraction Mission: SPACE -- for a whole lot less cash and with plenty to spare for the Spaetzle, Schnitzel, and Frikadellen at the property's "Biergarten" restaurant.To learn more about becoming a "private astronaut," and to secure your "space ticket," please click on the following link:… [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 10:31 am
In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation is a long-running and closely-watched case that raises many significant questions concerning the role of law in connection with the governance of large public corporations. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 10:44 am
Don’t hold your breath — instead, it looks like we’re going to see a big player settle, and chilling effects for upstarts. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
" In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 12:10 pm
Why should we give up the perks of our sex until we're sure of what we'll get in exchange? [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:52 am
In June 2006 the court, in In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation (New Developments discussion here), defined bad faith, and by implication good faith. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:57 am
Walt Disney Co., --- F.3d ----, 2006 WL 3091464 (11th Cir. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 5:57 pm
" We're going to keep the pressure on ABC, but we're also broadening our focus today to the Walt Disney Company, which owns ABC. [read post]
