Search for: "In re Wells (1971)" Results 301 - 320 of 664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 6:21 am by Juan C. Antúnez
In 1971 the Florida Supreme Court told us in In re: Estate of Carpenter,253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971), that a presumption of undue influence gets triggered if the contestant proves: (1) the existence of a confidential relationship between the testator and the will’s proponent; and (2) the active procurement of the will by the proponent. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Aena operates major hubs in Barcelona and Madrid, as well as a further 15 airports in Europe and America, including London Luton. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 8:15 am
We're counting oranges again. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
  It is best to give notice well before the 20-day deadline as the AG’s written response can serve as proof of timely notice or waiver o [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
  It is best to give notice well before the 20-day deadline as the AG’s written response can serve as proof of timely notice or waiver o [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
  It is best to give notice well before the 20-day deadline as the AG’s written response can serve as proof of timely notice or waiver of [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:52 pm by Roy Black
Ernest Medina in his 1971 court-martial for the My Lai Massacre during the Vietnam War. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:53 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
As Lepore notes: The papers of Supreme Court Justices are not public records; they’re private property. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
How well do you know Watergate? [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am by Jordan Gold
 “Five for fighting” – The National Hockey League’s Liability for Fighting and Enforcers As the season changes to winter, many Canadians turn their attention to the national pastime: hockey. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
., 402 U.S. 313 (1971), the Supreme Court precluded a patentee from re-asserting a patent that had been found invalid in a separate suit. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
It requires, as well, measures to ensure adherence to the principles of supremacy of law, equality before the law, accountability to the law, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers, participation in decision-making, legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness and procedural and legal transparency. [read post]