Search for: "Interest of S.B."
Results 301 - 320
of 457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
Finally, for those of you who are interested in following the criminal defense bar’s attempts to challenge S.B. 1960, I have heard that the docket for the case in Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal is 3D12-2034. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:28 pm
South Florida’s criminal defense and criminal appeals lawyers who take court-appointed criminal cases and appeals may be interested to know that the case filed by Brent DelGaizo to challenge the constitutionality of S.B. 1960 is moving forward. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:41 pm
South Florida criminal defense lawyers who are interested in Florida’s latest legislative reforms to payment for court appointed counsel, otherwise known as S.B. 1960, might like to know that the Broward and Miami Dade Associations of Criminal Defense Lawyers have filed a petition seeking to challenge the constitutionality of S.B. 1960. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
With regard to mortgage origination, S.B. 2763 amends the state SAFE Act to reflect changes to the federal law and to adjust originator registration fees. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
” State Senator Alex Padilla, a San Fernando Democrat, introduced a bill (S.B. 1161) that would implement this policy in California. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
& S.B. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:14 am
They only really agreed that A.R.S. 11-1051(B) was not overruled, but Adrian made an interesting point that got an even more interesting reaction. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
One of the more interesting posts, though, was by Jeffrey Toobin, “That’s Just Nino: Scalia’s Arizona Dissent. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm
Some Justices may recognize the broader non-discrimination interests presented in the federal government’s preemption claim. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Some Justices may recognize the broader non-discrimination interests presented in the federal government’s preemption claim. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
At the bottom of the letter for S.B., he drew a picture of himself naked with a speech bubble stating, “I love you [S.B.] [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
The editorial board of The New York Times condemns the Court’s denial of certiorari in seven cases filed by Guantánamo Bay detainees as a “retreat from habeas” and “devastatingly clear [evidence] that the Roberts court has no interest in ensuring meaningful habeas review for foreign prisoners. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
§ 2201, as well irreparable harm, the balance of equities tipping strongly in its favor, and injury to the public interest, justifying injunctive relief. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:43 pm
It is axiomatic that trauma to one child reverberates throughout the family, disrupting its balance and creating potential dire consequences for the non-abused siblings (Hill, 2003).4 For this reason, as Hollingsworth, Glass and Heisler (2007) write, “It is imperative during an investigation of abuse in which a targeted child has endured physical abuse, neglect, or bizarre discipline that the siblings also be evaluated”(pp. 84-85).5 Just as we rigorously evaluate dangerous traffic… [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:12 am
(a) In this section:(1) "Department" means the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.(2) "Penal institution" has the meaning assigned by Article 62.001, Code of Criminal Procedure.(3) "Wrongfully imprisoned person" has the meaning assigned by Section 501.091, Government Code, as added by Chapter 1389 (S.B. 1847), Acts of the 81st Legislature, Regular Session, 2009. [read post]
5 May 2012, 9:12 am
., a social media and mobile gaming business, since May 2011 when CIE acquired a controlling interest. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
Justice Alito pushed on this point with an interesting hypothetical example. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm
United States, observing with particular interest because I am counsel in the separate civil rights coalition challenge to S.B. 1070 (and challenges to the five copycat state laws that were enacted in 2011). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm
But his national supremacy argument seemed regularly to falter, because the Justices as a group seemed much more interested in parsing just how the Arizona law would work in tandem with or, potentially, in conflict with federal policy. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
The statement of the case as presented to SCOTUS was as follows: Arizona enacted the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (S.B. 1070) to address the illegal immigration crisis in the State. [read post]
