Search for: "Ip v. C. I. R" Results 301 - 320 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Verlag Esterbauer GmbH, C-490/14, 29 October 2015 protection of databases in EU https://t.co/HV4nn0kTiW -> With TPP advancing, India pins hopes on China-backed trade bloc | Reuters https://t.co/nDPI8EI057 -> President Obama Sends Two WIPO Copyright Treaties To US Senate For Ratification https://t.co/yBOTFeMXi3 -> Copyright notice scheme takes back seat to website blocking https://t.co/w2rcox4IYA -> Copyright Protection in Canada for Artists https://t.co/UzdKg9Z5zM -> Linking… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:15 am by Eleonora Rosati
Like the AG, it held that Article 17 is a new liability regime (“nouveau régime de responsabilité”: para 20), whose various parts form a unicum whole. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Adds Karen (whom you can email here): "I worked at an R&D company where we routinely received these letters addressed to the "Patent Department" or "IP Office". [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  IP rights: find a party interested in creating/disseminating the good & give them exclusive control. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
R v Sutherland underpins the importance of briefing those conducting the surveillance beforehand on the specific authorisation.The significance of these reports lies not so much in the specifics, but in the fact that they illustrate a more effective form of regulating surveillance. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
That view has been largely supplanted in IP scholarship and in legal culture generally in recent years, as seen in the last big public domain case that came before the Court, Eldred v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
This computer code then generated a communication from those users' computers to the government-operated server containing various identifying information, including those users' IP addresses. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm by David Lat
Sullivan & Cromwell (leading S&C to complain to the court that “[t]here is no good faith reason to attach a copy of this entire document to the Charney Complaint”); Carey v. [read post]