Search for: "Irish v. Irish" Results 301 - 320 of 1,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2015, 4:28 pm by Steve Sheinberg
  (Schrems v the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am by Darius Whelan
She spoke about recent cases in the Court of Protection, including cases concerning termination of pregnancy and persons in a vegetative state.Mr Michael Lynn, Senior Counsel:  ‘Recent Developments in Mental Health Law’: Mr Lynn discussed important cases such as  A.B. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am by Darius Whelan
She spoke about recent cases in the Court of Protection, including cases concerning termination of pregnancy and persons in a vegetative state.Mr Michael Lynn, Senior Counsel:  ‘Recent Developments in Mental Health Law’: Mr Lynn discussed important cases such as  A.B. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:38 am
In the first Irish case to consider the scope of the Directive and the Irish implementing Regulations the High Court has held that the answer is yes - an answer which may have significant implications for Irish sites hosting other types of user generated content.The case - Mulvaney v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:56 am
The European Court of Human rights gave a decision earlier this month in Copland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
On this day in ...... 1956, via a 1-sentence per curiam order in Board of Trustees v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:13 am by Aoife O'Donoghue
Eilionóir Flynn’s Book From Rhetoric to Action (0)July 12, 2011 -- H v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Free speech rights in the Irish Constitution 2.1 The freedom of political expression The right “to express freely … convictions and opinions” contained in Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution is now understood, broadly speaking, as a freedom of political expression, concerned with the public activities of citizens in a democratic society (see Murphy v Irish Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, 24, [1998] 2 ILRM 360, 372, (28 May… [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
Furthermore, in a recent paper at the Constitution At 70 conference in TCD last weekend, she presented a paper (which will in time be published) dealing with the Irish situation; she concludes that the development of the ‘constitutional tort’ (a notable feature of Irish constitutional law) may be necessary in a climate of privatisation and contracting-out. [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:42 am
He is Irish and always has something to say about the weather. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am by Darius Whelan
 Hogan J. does not refer explicitly to the significant Irish employment law case of Lewis v Squash Ireland [1983] ILRM 363. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:15 am by Yvonne Daly
It was confirmed yesterday that the Irish government has withdrawn its appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court decision of McKechnie J in Foy v An t-Ard Chláraitheoir & Ors. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by Yvonne Daly
On Friday last, March 25th 2011, in ED v DPP the High Court ruled that section 12 of the Immigration Act 2004 was unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-11-30: Google Scholar link to AUTHORS GUILD, INC. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Section 9(2) codified the approach of the Court of Appeal in Dow Jones v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (03 February 2005) established that there needs to be a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction for a defamation claim to be made (see also Sullivan v Bristol Film Studios [2012] EWCA civ 570 (03 May 2012); Reed Elsevier (t/a Lexisnexis) v Bewry [2014] EWCA Civ 1411 (30 October 2014)). [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:37 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled earlier this week in Ozaltin v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:30 pm
Supreme Court decision entitled Murray v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:45 am
One way he explained how the "super-national courts" work for Americans in the room was to imagine a court of all the countries of North America and South America that would have to decide a case as controversial as Roe v. [read post]