Search for: "Irvine v. California"
Results 301 - 320
of 403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
Seljak v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Dan Burk, University of California, Irvine, School of Law Copyright and the Cybernetic Circuit Legacy assumptions of ©: romantic author, original genius, classical narrative. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
University of California at Irvine law professor Rick Hasen, a prominent progressive election law scholar, comments: Like the district court, this (very liberal) panel of 6th Circuit judges reads both the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:21 am
Aslam, 43, Irvine, California, and formerly of Lincolnwood, Illinois, six counts of bank fraud and one count of making false statements; Leonardo V. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
Anthony Nicholas OrbanOriginal Article There appears to be more to this story than what is being reported, see the video below. 04/27/2012 West Hollywood (PRWEB) - Jury selection began today in People of the State of California v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:55 am
Foto: University Club – University of California, Irvine “El juez Antonin Scalia está estableciendo un terrible ejemplo para los abogados jóvenes. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
" That is the correct and prudent legal analysis, made by a Professor of Law at the University of California, Irvine School of Law, who thereby obtains our scholarly admiration. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am
Whytock (University of California, Irvine) Ronald A. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law · … [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Wade, according to Leah Litman of the University of California, Irvine School of Law in a column for The New York Times. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:55 am
– Erwin Chemerinsky – UPR Microjuris al Día transmitió la conferencia magistral del decano de la Escuela de Derecho de University of California-Irvine, Erwin Chemerinsky, desde la Escuela de Derecho de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Kuhn, Nossaman LLP, Irvine, California, Dwight H. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
The Catalog Is Out of the Bag Award: Special Services Group In response to a California Public Records Act request for information about surveillance technology, the Irvine Police Department in California provided researchers at MuckRock and Open the Government with a catalog called the “Black Book” from a secretive company called Special Services Group. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
The Catalog Is Out of the Bag Award: Special Services Group In response to a California Public Records Act request for information about surveillance technology, the Irvine Police Department in California provided researchers at MuckRock and Open the Government with a catalog called the “Black Book” from a secretive company called Special Services Group. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition on… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary… [read post]
