Search for: "J. A. Nicklin "
Results 301 - 320
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeal upheld an appeal by Dyson Technology Limited and Dyson Limited against the decision of Nicklin J on 31 October 2022 ([2022] EWHC 2718 (KB)) that based solely on intrinsic evidence, they were not referred to in the Channel 4 broadcast that was the subject of their libel claim. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 2:12 pm
Nicklin J notes at [36] of his judgment that Moses J did not consider the effect of section 88(2), and he therefore concluded that the comparators offered by Mr Gangera do not illuminate the point advanced by Mr Simawi in this case. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Mellor J found that “it is clear that Dr Wright engaged in the deliberate production of false documents to support false claims and use the Courts as a vehicle for fraud [5]. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
On 6 and 7 May 2020 there was a hearing in the breach of confidence and misuse of private information case of Barclay v Barclay before Warby J. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The same newspaper reported on trial of the case of Oliver v Nine News which took place before Lee J. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 12 March 2018, Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Churchill Ltd v The Open College Network [2018] EWHC 457 (QB) striking out the claim on the basis of the limitation defence advanced by defendant. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 30 January 2018, Nicklin J heard an application for committal in the case of Al-Ko Kober Ltd & ors v Sambh. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
The role of inference in the serious harm test The Court of Appeal essentially overruled Steyn J’s decision on three grounds. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 26 January 2022 there was a directions hearing in the case of HM Attorney-General v BBC before Chamberlain J. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
On 17 April 2019 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2019] EWHC 970 (QB)(heard 27 to 30 November 2018). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Warby LJ, upholding this aspect of Nicklin J’s first instance judgment, answered emphatically that it is not: “the only question raised by section 3(3) of the 2013 Act is whether the statement complained of indicated the basis of the opinion which it contained [44]. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
The question of whether there has been an unlawful misuse of private information in the publication of the recorded information involves two questions (see, most recently Nicklin J in ZXC v Bloomberg [2019] EWHC 970 (QB) at [110]): First, was there a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information? [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
On 28 October 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application to commit in the case of GUH v KYT, judgment was reserved. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
On 10 February 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BHX v GRX Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Ogbonna v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Mitting J preferred the claimant’s meaning. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft & William J. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
On 7 and 8 March 2019 Warby J heard the first two days of data protection trial in the case of Rudd v Bridle. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
In Dyson v Channel Four Television Corporation [2022] EWHC 2718 (KB) (31 October 2022) at first instance, Nicklin J said: 18. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
On 22 May 2018 Nicklin J heard a preliminary issue on meaning in the case of Gideon Falter v Gilad Atzmon concerning an article on the defendant’s website entitled “Antisemitism is merely a business plan”. [read post]
