Search for: "J. H.1" Results 301 - 320 of 4,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
For example, the top rate kicks in at or above $1 million in California (when the “millionaire’s tax” surcharge is included), Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm by admin
”[5] The authors of the epidemiology chapter acknowledge, in a footnote, “that [h]earsay concerns may limit the independent admissibility of the study, but the study could be relied on by an expert in forming an opinion and may be admissible pursuant to Fed. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm by Jacob Tingen
Contents Chapter 1 Who This Guide is For Chapter 2 How to Apply for a Green Card Chapter 3 Lawful Entries& Immigrant Intent … [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Eric S. Solotoff
In doing so, the court applied the statutory factors found at NJSA 2A:34-23 (J)(1) – which are the standards to be applied to post-amendment alimony obligations. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
§§ 256b, 1396r-8(a)(1), (5).[2] Such healthcare providers typically serve low-income and rural populations. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
  One story that is repeated countless times in the lore of Section 404 is that at the time the SEC adopted the rules, the agency estimated Section 404 compliance costs to be approximately $91,000 per firm.[1] This number was heavily criticized by many as grossly underestimating the true costs associated with Section 404.[2] Critics of the SEC would routinely cite this number as evidence that the SEC had no idea just how costly complying with Section 404 was.[3] In my… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
  (1) The chapter at least acknowledges that small relative risks (1 < RR <3) may be insufficient to support causal inferences.[1] (2) The chapter correctly notes that the method known as “differential etiology” addresses only specific causation, and that the method presupposes that general causation has been established.[2] (3) The third edition correctly observes that clinicians generally are not concerned with etiology as much as with diagnosis of… [read post]