Search for: "JOHN DOE AND PREDECESSORS" Results 301 - 320 of 764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2018, 12:02 pm by Dave
Any absurdity could have been avoided by the park owner writing in to the individual contracts that the resident could not use the property as their only or main residence (and thus not meet the criterion for security): “If the site owner does not impose such a restriction, he may find itself in difficulty, but the difficulty is one against which it (or its predecessor) could easily have protected themselves and there is no reason to allow their failure to do so to influence… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” In 2016, plaintiff commenced a holdover summary proceeding (“the Underlying Holdover Proceeding”} against Debs and Galland seeking possession of one of respondents’ SRO units based upon a claim that respondents-were violating a substantial obligation of the lease and the Housing Maintenance Code by allowing the premises to be occupied by two children (JMW 75 LLC v Claude Debs and Violaine Galland, and “John Doe” and… [read post]
” He then quickly changed the subject to Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and Peter Strzok. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 1:00 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Marlonn Hicks as a case study both in First Amendment and vagueness concerns Notes on other recent DOJ national security cases (Iranian spies and an IS fighter who made it to the US) President Trump, Signing Statements, and the NDAA: How does Trump compare to his recent predecessors? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
First, as a textualist, Kavanaugh would likely find statutes unambiguous more often than some of his more-purposivist peers who tend to interpret statutes in accordance with the statute’s purpose (and more often than his predecessor, Kennedy), and thus be less likely to defer to agency statutory interpretations. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
” American Pipe tolling does not preserve subsequent class actions. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 11:00 am by Chimène Keitner
One result of his attempt to emphasize this narrative theme is that Farrow substantively overstates the continuity between Trump’s fetish for the military (think military parade; “my generals”; etc.) and his impetuous and performative “America First” approach to international relations, on the one hand, and the prominent roles of the National Security Council and the Pentagon in foreign affairs under Trump’s immediate predecessors, on the other. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm by Alice O'Brien
” The lower courts have largely taken Garcetti, and its predecessor precedent, 1968’s Pickering v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm by Amy Howe
O’Connor wrote for the majority, in an opinion joined by Souter and Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm by MOTP
This court generally does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal unless the party shows "extraordinary circumstances"—that "the issue . . . is a pure question of law and a miscarriage of justice would result from our failure to consider it. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:11 am by Amy Howe
The state of Hawaii returned to court to challenge the September 2017 order, arguing that – just like its predecessors – it violated both federal law and the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:19 pm
But this not make make for glorious news stories, nor does it produce statue worthy events that can be memorized in primary school history classes. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:33 pm by Jim Sedor
State law does not allow candidates to do that. [read post]