Search for: "Jackson v. Browning"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm
” In a concurring opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson offered an approach to define the contours of “offenses relating to obstruction of justice. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson emphasized this point in a separate dissent, rejecting the majority’s framing as all but ignoring the constitutional right that should be at the center of the analysis. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:37 pm
The dissent of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson (joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor and for the most part by Justice Clarence Thomas) makes those points pretty successfully. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for a majority that included Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
And Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am
” In a methodical and sharp dissent, Justice Kentaji Brown Jackson pulled apart the majority’s reasoning piece by piece. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 1:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
Justice Thomas cited last year's decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
Gorsuch issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s concise opinion for the court opted for a simple and literal construction of the statute’s language. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am
The Court’s Majority Opinion In a 7-2 opinion by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the majority rejected the corporation’s arguments that spending clause statutes, like FNHRA, are in the nature of contracts between the federal government and the states. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Lora v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:32 pm
The lower courts rejected that idea, and on Thursday Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s opinion for an 8-1 majority affirmed those rulings. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:27 pm
Thursday’s ruling in Haaland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:21 pm
By contrast, Ketanji Brown Jackson, the newest justice, has almost no prior record. [read post]
