Search for: "Jackson v. Rule et al"
Results 301 - 320
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
In Brennan et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:40 pm
Cited Madge v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Int’l L. 457-550 (2010).Carrico, Amanda R., et al. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 14, 2009)Affirming dismissal of Black fem welder's sex- and race-based harassment and retaliatory discharge claims7th Circuit* Jackson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
On one hand, they restrict private employer choice, and can often undermine private employers' legitimate policy interests, much as other antidiscrimination laws do; I'm generally a supporter of employment-at-will as a legal rule, and am not eager to see further restrictions on that rule. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Click Here Appeals Court Reverses TVA Emissions Ruling. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
Most states have rules or law that looks similar to federal law, but state judges, not uncommonly, look for ways to avoid their institutional responsibilities. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Michael Whitten, et al., 2010 U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Today I’ll talk about Rule 506 of Regulation D (“Reg D”). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]Highlights this week included:EU wants 95 year copyright on recordings: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Law360),Harvard Arts and Sciences Faculty decides to allow open access to research: (Techdirt), (Michael Geist), (Ars Technica), (Against Monopoly),Summary judgment hearing 8 Feb: Tafas & GSK v Dudas concerning implementation of the USPTO’s new… [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
[N]o argument about what he did or didn't facilitate, or about his special obligations as an attorney, makes his conduct morally equivalent to that of his nominal clients, Secretary Rumsfeld, et al., or comparable to the conduct of interrogators distant in time, rank and place. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
The second aspect considers the range of non-legal normative governance rules that might apply. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Weems, et al., the two Boston Massacre Trials of Captain Thomas Preston and eight other British redcoats - for the paltry sum of eighteen guineas, future-president-to-be John Adams, then a 34-year old lawyer in Boston, took on the unpopular defense of these almost surely-to-be-hung soldiers. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
