Search for: "Jacobsen v. Jacobsen" Results 301 - 320 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
Supp. 2d 479, 484 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) (“the federal duty of ‘sameness’’’ also applies in the context of generic drug design, and federal law preempts state laws imposing a duty to change a drug’s design on generic drug manufacturers”); Jacobsen v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm by David B. Rivkin and Lee A. Casey
  Perhaps the closest analogy is found in Jacobsen v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
The court declined to reinstate the employee’s gross negligence cause of action or to consider his unpreserved retaliation claims (Jacobsen v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp, March 27, 2014, Abdus-Salaam, S). [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:33 am by Marcia Shein
Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984) where an employee of a private delivery service cannot consent to the search of packages in transit. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]