Search for: "Jane Doe 4" Results 301 - 320 of 831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
The Ninth Circuit upheld that restriction last year, relying on the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm by Eric Goldman
  De Havilland’s character appeared for only 17 minutes in an eight-episode miniseries (less than 4% of the work). [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
By a vote of 12-4, the Sixth Circuit concluded the answer is "no" -- at least under current precedent. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 10:03 am
The latest issue of the European Journal of International Law (Vol. 28, no. 4, November 2017) is out. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
When the judge insisted, Aaron divulged that the person being considered does not possess a security clearance. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit’s opinion does not discuss that theory, even though the district court had invoked it to certify the class. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
, this post and this one), and Carter Phillips/Sidley Austin have filed a terrific brief in opposition on behalf of the Respondents, in which they (among other things) carefully explain why the SG’s accusations of ethical breaches by Jane Doe’s attorneys are groundless. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Improving the Public-Private Cybersecurity Partnership September 4, 2017  | Justin S. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by David Luban
The government also wants the Court to take disciplinary action against Jane Doe’s counsel. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Affiliated Ute Does Not Apply to Claims Based Primarily on Misstatements The Second Circuit agreed with defendants that the district court should not have given plaintiffs the benefit of the Affiliated Ute Adhering to two of its prior decisions, the court held that Affiliated Ute does not apply to claims based “primarily” on affirmative misstatements, as opposed to omissions.[6] The court noted that the alleged omissions were “simply the inverse” of the… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:18 am by SHG
In the Jane Doe case, Garza’s client was an undocumented pregnant minor. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:53 pm
It's how they tried to prevent Jane Doe from exercising her constitutionally protected reproductive freedom. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am by Sarah Grant
Jane Doe 4 currently serves in the Army National Guard and reenlisted effective Aug. 24, 2017, extending her commitment until Feb. 2020. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  There has been some very good scholarship and journalism, notably by Theda Skocpol and Jane Mayer, exploring that question. [read post]