Search for: "John R Rose" Results 301 - 320 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Meeting of the Minds at the Inbox: Some Pitfalls of Contracting via Email – New York attorney Jeff Neuburger of Proskauer Rose in the firm’s Privacy Law Blog NLRB Wonders WTF (Why the Fuss?) [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:41 am by Allison Tussey
Attorney Rose is joined in making today’s announcement by John A. [read post]
31 May 2015, 8:12 am by Robert Kreisman
The attorneys representing the DiNardi family were John Houlihan Jr. and Michael Kennedy of Hartford, Conn. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:02 am by Staci Zaretsky
John's, Drake, and Buffalo -- have decided to drop the LSAT for top-performing applicants, and it's no surprise that all five law schools have watched their enrollment numbers take traumatic tumbles. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm
We got the most direct answer to that question only when the Michigan attorney defending marriage bans, John Bursch, rose to speak. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm by Gene Quinn
Upon the resignation of Jon Dudas from the USPTO in January 2009, then Commissioner for Patents John Doll rose from his post as Commissioner... [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:06 pm by Bill Marler
California investigators learned that in April or May the pesto had been made by Rose Schwinn dba Rose’s Artesian Creations. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Kehoe and Lawrence Lorber of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Employment Law Lookout Title IX and Sexual Violence in the Wake of the Failures of the Rolling Stone ‘A Rape on Campus’ Narrative: What All Educational Institutions Need to Know – Alysha Stein-Manes of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm’s California Public Agency Labor & Employment Blog Gawker Interns and the Use of Social Media to Notify Potential Class Members- Cleveland lawyer… [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am by INFORRM
It has also asked for an adjournment in an Operation Elveden trial involving a journalist while it considers the “wider implications” of the decision in R v ABC and others [2015] EWCA Crim 359. [read post]