Search for: "Judicial Officer"
Results 301 - 320
of 31,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Hirshfeld, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that decisions by the US Patent and Trademark Office Director vacating ex parte reexamination based on estoppel may be subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Hirshfeld, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that decisions by the US Patent and Trademark Office Director vacating ex parte reexamination based on estoppel may be subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Hirshfeld, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that decisions by the US Patent and Trademark Office Director vacating ex parte reexamination based on estoppel may be subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Hirshfeld, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that decisions by the US Patent and Trademark Office Director vacating ex parte reexamination based on estoppel may be subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Hirshfeld, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that decisions by the US Patent and Trademark Office Director vacating ex parte reexamination based on estoppel may be subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:37 am
In A Free Speech Right to Impugn Judicial Integrity in Court Proceedings, Professor Tarkington examines why a free speech right to impugn judicial integrity must be recognized for attorneys - even, and perhaps especially, when acting as officers of the court and making statements in court proceedings. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
Officers executing a facially valid discovery order that required entry into property were entitled to quasi-judicial immunity for that act. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:10 pm
The Maine Supreme Court censured and briefly suspended a judge for misrepresentations against an opponent for judicial office that may have had an impact on the election results. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:09 am
Should be turned out of office. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:37 am
News Sources Welcome – EDRM EDRM Announces GenAI Judicial Orders Repository – EDRM Judicial Orders – EDRM Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies Additional Reading The Role of the Chief AI Officer in Shaping Cybersecurity, Information Governance, and eDiscovery From Silicon Valley to Sacramento: California’s Bold AI Regulatory Framework Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ The post EDRM Launches Comprehensive AI-related Judicial Orders… [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm
Department of Justice’s Office of Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training (OPDAT). [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:11 am
Courts must create a searchable database to enable public access to any report required to be filed by a federal judicial officer, bankruptcy judge, or magistrate judge. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 8:12 pm
Even the floor serves as an office at JFK airport for preparing habeas corpus petitions. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
The commission was tasked with examining numerous issues, including public financing of campaigns for judicial offices and the costs and practical funding sources for such a system (other than via the state’s general fund). [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:59 am
The post Should You Be More Judicious with Your Input? [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Voters will decide whether judges remain in office on November 6. [read post]
31 May 2008, 7:09 am
A Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee opinion from Florida opines that a judge may make a financial contribution to defray the expenses of the campaign of a child for student government office at a state university. [read post]
21 May 2023, 1:24 pm
(c) is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding[.]6 Regarding Rule 2.11(A), the Court explained that: Our Supreme Court has set forth the standard where one seeks disqualification of a judicial officer under Rule 2.11(A)(1): ‘[T]he judge must engage in a two-part analysis to determine if recusal is warranted. [read post]
31 May 2010, 12:14 am
For example, codes of judicial conduct prohibit ex parte communications, the misuse of office, public commentary on prohibited topics, and participation in certain civic, religious, and political activities. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
SB 24 would put the new fund under the administrative control of the state’s Administrative Office of the Courts. [read post]
