Search for: "KAY v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 12:47 am
"    "Yipeee kai aaaa mother f'er. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
Cameron (@JasmineDCameron) Trump – Intelligence Community Trump’s States Goals for the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:07 am
Halliburton, Extraterritoriality,Fraud-on-the-Market, Jurisdiction, Omnicare v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:22 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) - the Hawaii Kai Marina case - physical invasions, regulatory takings, and interference with settled expectations. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
In the case of Pui Kwan Kay v Ming Pao Holdings [2015] HKCA 540 the Court of Appeal allowed the defendant’s appeal in a libel case brought by the vice-chairman of the Hong Kong Football Association after the Court of Appeal ruled the paper made its comments in the public interest. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am by Adam Wagner
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued February 9, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Boyer-Gladden v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Justice Maurice Kay accepted that “the context – the protection of vulnerable children – is important and, together with a degree of urgency may impact on the requirement of procedural fairness“. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:11 pm by Elie Mystal
[Federalist Society Events] * I was on the Brian Lehrer Show again, this time with Kai Wright, and I broke down like seven Supreme Court cases in half an hour, including basically wetting myself when they let me lead with REAL PROPERTY in the form of the Murr v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case involves a life insurance policy issued by New York Life Insurance Company to the CEO of Mary Kay Cosmetics. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
For these reasons the present case is indistinguishable from authorities such as Kay v Lambeth LBC [2005] QB 352 at paragraphs 107-8 and Austin v Southwark LBC [2010] HLR 1 So, the right to buy did not engage A1P1. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
According to Commissioner Harbour, Congress found that RPM led to substantially higher consumer prices, an increase in sales by less efficient distributors and retailers, decreased entry opportunities, and decreased inter-brand and intra-brand competition, which led Congress to pass the Consumer Goods Pricing Act of 1975 that repealed the state fair trade laws.Harm to Retailers - The losing party in the Leegin case, Phil Smith - an owner of Kay's Kloset, spoke at the… [read post]