Search for: "Kansas v. Missouri" Results 301 - 320 of 684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Kyle Krull
For a recent (and important reminder) on how strict Medicare and Medicaid can be when it comes to determining benefit eligibility, consider the case of the Matter of Komanoff Ctr. for Geriatric & Rehabilitative Medicine v Daines (N.Y. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
" However, CDS did show use of its mark in Kansas and was entitled to the entire state; in addition, because a large percentage of CDS's business in Kansas City comes from Missouri, the Board awarded CDS a portion of Missouri. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
The corporate veil is not an unlimited defense… as yet another owner of a sole shareholder corporation has discovered in a recent case, Bogosian v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Gehl Co., 184 F.3d 1259, 1270 (10th Cir. 1999) (applying Kansas law); Horstmyer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Gehl Co., 184 F.3d 1259, 1270 (10th Cir. 1999) (applying Kansas law); Horstmyer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Gehl Co., 184 F.3d 1259, 1270 (10th Cir. 1999) (applying Kansas law); Horstmyer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Gehl Co., 184 F.3d 1259, 1270 (10th Cir. 1999) (applying Kansas law); Horstmyer v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
The case I referenced in Pennsylvania is Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm by Andis Kaulins
Missouri: Bulldogs favored by 3 Our call: Missouri 31-30    Result: - Louisiana Tech v. [read post]