Search for: "Kaplan, Inc." Results 301 - 320 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
First, on October 28, 2010, plaintiffs’ lawyers initiated a securities suit against The Washington Post Company and certain of its directors and offices, in connection with the companies Kaplan, Inc. education subsidiary. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:53 pm by Ashby Jones
The work had helped forge a $49 million settlement in an antitrust class-action against BAR/BRI parent company West Publishing and Kaplan Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Kaplan’s attorneys had in fact sent a letter disclosing the witnesses over two months prior to trial. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Kaplan’s attorneys had in fact sent a letter disclosing the witnesses over two months prior to trial. [read post]
  The sole Republican member of the Board, Member Kaplan, concurred in the decision, but stated that the Alstate Maintenance standard remained appropriate. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:44 am by Adam Santucci and Bill Boak
  See Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB 1599 (2015) (“BFI”). [read post]
Member Kaplan Concurs and Dissents Member Kaplan concurred with the Board’s ultimate decision in Wendt, insofar as he agreed that the unilateral change the employer made was inconsistent with its “long-standing practice. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Silberfeld, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Los Angeles Martin D. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:55 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938, 943, 115 S.Ct. 1920, 131 L.Ed.2d 985 (1985)(holding question of primary power to decide arbitrability "turns upon what the parties agreed about that matter"); AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:03 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Circuit also addressed Jesner in Kaplan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by John Lewis
Peoplemark, Inc., (Case No. 11-2582) assessing fees and costs against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) totaling $751,942.48 for continuing to pursue an action it knew to be meritless. [read post]