Search for: "Kay v. Kay" Results 301 - 320 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm
Karnavas, The Serendipitous Nature of the ICC Trial Proceedings Risks the ICC’s Credibility Stefan Kirsch, Vom eingeschränkten Nutzen strafrechtlicher Urteile für die Historiographie: Ein Beitrag zum Zustandekommen des ersten deutschen Urteils wegen Völkermordes in Ruanda André Klip, Fundamentally Dissenting Judge Schomburg Otto Lagodny, Combatting Terrorism without Secret Services? [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
 The Republicans blame Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Jimmy Carter, Chuck Schumer, Barak Obama, North Korea, Chaing Kai-Shek, Julia Child, legalized Marijuana,  and Mister Rogers. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
The judgment handed down yesterday, Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) was a public judgment and was said to be expressed in muted or anodyne terms by the Lord  Justice Maurice Kay. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am by INFORRM
Her claims were dismissed by Master Kay QC because he found that she had sued the wrong defendant in each action. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:51 am
(on the application of) [2007] EWCA Civ 498 (23 May 2007) Carnegie v Drury [2007] EWCA Civ 497 (23 May 2007) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Baiai & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 478 (23 May 2007) Brunel University & Anor v Webster & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 482 (22 May 2007) ERG Raffinerie Mediterranee SPA v Chevron USA Inc (t/a Chevron Texaco Global Trading) [2007] EWCA Civ 494 (22 May 2007) C Plc v P & Anor [2007] EWCA… [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 11:33 pm
Morse and Felicia Kay Pennington, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 2:28 pm
Maurice Kay LJ also called for the Trade Marks Registry to exclude such evidence from its hearings.Jacob LJ also noted that this was a case which 'suffered greatly from over elaboration in both evidence and argument' where things have become complicated unnecessarily.The IPKat reckons their Lordships are sounding a little grumpy. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 6:22 am
[Kay @ National Post] In defense of lobbying. [read post]