Search for: "Kind v. Clark" Results 301 - 320 of 489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2021, 5:53 pm by Russell Knight
Again the distinction between kinds of orders is important because of the appealability of either type of order. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Although Willis, acting for Fulton County and the state of Georgia, has no power to grant Powell or Chesebro any kind of immunity against federal prosecution, pursuant to the SCOTUS decisions in Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:09 pm by Bill
He was backed by his son, George V, and was genial and enthusiastic. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:01 am by Tim Sitzmann
(Imagine your grandchildren asking incredulously, “You mean the Volkswagen ‘V’ used to mean peace? [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am by Colin Miller
Clark, 18 F.3d 1337 (6th Cir. 1994), Jeffrey Mullins, Roger Clark, and others allegedly robbed three banks. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:45 am by Charon QC
The kind of circumstances in which the provision of information might be so deficient as to make silence a reasonable response were considered in R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
What kind of repeating arms were available before 1815, when the Madison-Monroe mass production innovation program began? [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm by Adam Wagner
But there is no doubt that the kind of sums we spend now on public inquiries, the kind of sums we spend now on some parts of legal aid, vastly exceed anything that we would have contemplated when I was in practice. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Those are the kinds of information we really like to know from prescribers - how they judge the science; how they judge the drug; and how they judge the company. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Clark 13-555Issue: Whether a federal court has authority in extraordinary circumstances to bar a state from reprosecuting a defendant when state officials violate a federal habeas order and engage in continuing misconduct that substantially prejudices the defendant’s ability to secure a fair retrial. [read post]