Search for: "King v. Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 8:56 pm by Mark Ashton
Super. 161    (Sept. 21, 2022)  Bender, Dubrow & King w/o dissent/concurrence Nota bene: A judicial friend sent me a copy of Shoemaker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:06 am by Mills & Mills LLP
The Un-Royal Treatment of the Crypto King A recent case from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, while dealing with a strange and unique case, reconfirmed the law on setting aside an Agreement of Purchase and Sale where the seller has made a fraudulent misrepresentation, or where there is a latent defect in the property. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/286207.opn.doc.pdf In Other News King County Superior Court Judge Joan E. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm by MOTP
  Old and Modern Harris County Courthouse  Once you (are forced  by the Texas Supreme Court to) accept the premise that the government is entitled to win in civil disputes with citizens because the government is the government -- a modern version of "The King Can Do No Wrong" -- and that it is the job of the courts to apply that principle and shut the courthouse door to victims of the government's agents it's easier to understand it… [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 9:07 am
A proposed new Uniform Superior Court Rule and a model Parenting Plan have been promulgated, as part of the implementation of House Bill 369 on January 1, 2008. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:42 pm by LTA-Editor
Plaintiffs in this case, members of a yet-to-be-certified class of Clearwire customers, filed their complaint in King County Superior Court in April 2009. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am by Susan Brenner
[Sayer] was convicted in Maine Superior Court for stalking the victim [who] obtained a protection from abuse order against [him] and in February 2008 [Sayer] was convicted of violating that protective order. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:13 pm by Michael Atkins
The Western District sent it back to King County Superior Court — from which the case had been removed — finding plaintiff’s causes of action sound in state court, the court plaintiff had selected. [read post]