Search for: "King v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2010, 4:45 am
Costco relied upon a 1998 Supreme Court decision in Quality King, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:32 pm
Telesca v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
The first question was just answered by the Supreme Court; the second question is at the heart of King v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:21 pm
In a recent case involving a constitutional challenge to seizing a person's DNA without his consent, the United States Supreme Judicial Court, in Maryland v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 3:00 pm
Piccadilly Cafeterias (07-312), and United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
State, A Brief History of the Netherlands p. 37). [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:43 am
The issue has divided lower federal and state courts, and the case of King v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am
United States (here, with Gabriel Lather) and Hickenlooper v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
’ ” ’ (Vons, supra, 14 Cal.4th at p. 447, quoting Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:12 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), is an fascinating decision. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:39 am
The complaint (full text) in C.F. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:58 am
The Defendants moved, inter alia, for partial summary judgment based on: (a) a claim that one of the Plaintiffs had submitted fraudulent documents when applying for employment with one of the Defendants in violation of the Immigration and Reform Control Act of 1986 ("IRCA"), which criminalizes the presentation of forged evidence of entitlement to employment within the United States; and (b) the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Hoffman… [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:18 pm
(Habeas Corpus; Tribal Court; Exhaustion of Tribal Court Remedies) United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
I despise Cooper v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:01 pm
See King v. [read post]
