Search for: "Kumar v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Madhavan Sunil Kumar (1998) 6 SCC 514 which laid down that cause of action under Section 138 arose only once and if the concept of successive causes of action were to be accepted the same would make the limitation under Section 142(b) otiose.In Sadanandan Bhadran v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
., on Saturday, May 4, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Climate change, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Executive Compensation, Index funds, Pay for performance, Shareholder rights, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting, Sustainability Operating Principles for Impact Management Posted by Irina Likhachova, International Finance Corporation, on Sunday, May 5, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Asset management, Corporate… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Blurred Lines: Government Involvement in Corporate Internal Investigations and Implications for Individual Accountability Posted by Andrew Bauer, Jonathan Green, and Sara D’Amico, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, June 7, 2019 Tags: Banks, Deutsche Bank, DOJ, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, LIBOR, Securities enforcement, U.S. federal courts Board Development and Director Succession Planning in the Age of Shareholder… [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
No, says the Supreme Court of India in Sri Kumar Padma Prasad v Union of India : (1992) 2 SCC 428, an important case concerning the validity of appointment of a certain Mr Srivastava to the Gauhati High Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
Two notable gems are Maqbool Fida Hussain v Raj Kumar Pandey, 2008 (6) Del. 533 (decrying misuse of obcenity prosecutions) Ju [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Union of India [2005 (6) SCC 344], Ashok Kumar Mittal Vs. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by V.Venkatesan
The other categories of citizens, in terms of the Constitutional scheme, are Part III, Part IV, Article 311 and Part V. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
United States Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell, w [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
Vice President of Bing, Harry Shum, stated that"We do not copy Google's search results. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
A westernized young woman (Nargis)encourages the love of an acquaintance (Dilip Kumar)even though she is already engaged to anotherman (Raj Kapoor). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Multi-state outbreaks are generally reported to NORS by CDC. [read post]