Search for: "LARSON v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:20 pm
Borden Larson appealed the decisions of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida that granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Correct Craft, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
The CAFC, on jurisdictional grounds, does not resolve the assignment issues in Larson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 3:57 am
Frischenmeyer, No. 99,975 (Feb. 13, 2009); Sam Kepfield; and State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:14 am
Rick Kittel and KU Defender Project student Julie Larson won in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:30 pm
I just saw on SSRN this notable article by Carlton Larson about the Supreme Court's work in Heller, titled "Four Exceptions in Search of a Theory: District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:10 pm
Larson (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Four Exceptions in Search of a Theory: District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
"The text of the full decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us]* Section 17 of the Public Officers Law provides for the defense and indemnification of employees of the State as an employer being sued in federal or state courts. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The United States has the programs to deny trade benefits. [read post]