Search for: "LIBERTY v JONES" Results 301 - 320 of 612
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 8:39 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court has held that there’s a compelling government interest in banning race discrimination in government-supported education (Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm by Matt Danzer
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:00 pm by Harold O'Grady
The Supreme Court had the opportunity to reign in the scope of police surveillance in Jones v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:08 pm by Jeff Hermes
Yesterday, the Digital Media Law Project joined an all-star cast of organizations (including the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Kentucky, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Public Participation Project, and Wendy Seltzer and Adam Holland of Chilling Effects) in filing an amicus brief in Jones v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:49 am by Amy Howe
” The Jones Day law firm has announced that it has hired six lawyers who clerked at the Court last Term. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that a former university dean failed to establish that he was fired because he followed the school’s sexual assault policy in investigating a student’s claims that she was sexually assaulted by two football players, the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment on the dean’s wrongful discharge claim (Jones v University of Iowa, August 23, 2013, Zager, B). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
In an earlier post I quoted Justice Sotomayor’s statement (concurring in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Marcia Coyle’s The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution (Simon & Schuster, May 2013). [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Supreme Court Rules Against Routine Warrantless Blood Tests in DUI Cases: The Supreme Court ruled in our favor in Missouri v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:22 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Learn more about LGBT rights and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]