Search for: "LIN V US" Results 301 - 320 of 343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
Alan Lin (IPblog)   Australia AFACT v iiNET: Epic BitTorrent copyright case concludes (TorrentFreak)   Austria 900,000th .at domain registered (Class 46)   Canada isoHunt files new statement of claim against CRIA (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) David Canton on digital copyright reform – ‘three strikes is not a palatable solution’ (Michael Geist) Billy Bragg on music and copyright (Michael Geist)   China Will China create the next Silicon… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
Contrary to the Claimant’s arguments, R v Isington London Borough Council ex parte Reilly and Mannix (1998) 31 HLR 651, and R (on the application of Lin) v Barnet London Borough Council [2007] EWCA (Civ) 132 do not establish that such a policy must be incorporated into the scheme itself to meet s.167(8). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The SEC was authorized by Congress to prescribe rules to regulate the use of proxies "as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:50 am
  Readers will remember that this was the one point of success for Ms Lin in R(Lin) v Barnet LBC [2007] EWCA Civ 132 in which the CA held (at [48]) that, where a criterion was “central to the operation of a scheme”, it was required to be included in that scheme. and (2) that the operation of the local connection criterion effectively imposed a blanket ban on households who did not have that connection. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
I leave it to you, dear reader, to speculate as to any underlying motivation.In Hui Lin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 pm
LexTweet.com, a community of legal professionals using Twitter, will be running a group of Twitter users attending LegalTech in New York from February 2 to 4. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:59 am
The precedent relied upon is a curious enough case I remember from student days, Michélin v CAW (1996). [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am by MTTLR Blog Editor
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said it best in his dissent in Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]