Search for: "LIVINGSTON v LIVINGSTON"
Results 301 - 320
of 867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Mark Hamblett has the story at the New York Law Journal, and here's a link to the opinion, Byrne v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
Since West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
In that case, Piesco v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Thanks to Greg Lastowka for pointing me to this case: Bach v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:17 am
" "Henry Brockholst Livingston (U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 6:27 am
The Court of Appeals revives her case because the trial court did not properly instruct the jury on the elements of her claim.The case is Tardif v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals holds that the Act does not allow a woman to sue for discrimination that led to a reduced salary.The case is Davis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
This case highlights a gloss on qualified immunity.The case is Chase v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:10 am
" That regulation may be stricken from the books.The case is Central Rabbinical Congress v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:39 am
The retaliation took the form of a transfer to another prison.The case is Smith v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:36 am
The Court of Appeals vacates the habeas order and reinstates the conviction.The case is Garner v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:58 am
The process is not always so simple, however.The case is Husain v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
In this case, the officers gave the magistrate false information, but the plaintiff still loses the case.The case is Sanseverino v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:46 am
That's what this case is about.The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:39 am
" These claims are hard to win, but they are winnable.The case is Stephenson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:41 am
Kaufman, Livingston Hall, and David F. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am
This case shows that the so-called "rule of completeness" has its limits.The case is United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:32 am
The jury awarded each of them $18 million, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Restivo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
The Court of Appeals revives the excessive force claim.The case is Simcoe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
This employment discrimination case reminds us that management has much leeway in disciplining employees, and that even if the plaintiff makes out a prima facie case, the employer can get around that by showing it still had good reason to demote the plaintiff.The case is Carter v. [read post]
