Search for: "LOWE v. US " Results 301 - 320 of 11,033
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The book explores the protections over biological material and their exhaustion under patent and plant variety protection laws.Trade Marks Anna Maria Stein outlined the decision from the General Court which held that an EU figurative trade mark representing a lion’s head encircled by rings forming a chain for use in the fashion sector had a low level of distinctiveness, and dismissed the opposition.Marcel Pemsel discussed a recent case about when a license… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s imprimatur in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am by Amichai Cohen
Accordingly, regardless of whether South Africa could meet the low threshold required at the jurisdictional stage (The Gambia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm by Amy Howe
” And AI could be particularly useful, he posited, in ensuring broader access to justice. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  For one, Microsoft and OpenAI, proponents of the “fair use” basis for use of protected works in training, have offered to indemnify customers facing copyright litigation due to their use of Microsoft/OpenAI tools. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm by Aaron Moss
Netflix was decided after the Supreme Court managed to make fair use even more complicated in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by Pablo Arredondo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 12:48 pm by Matt Kurnick
Share on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare by EmailShare Back to top On December 5, 2023, the Ninth Circuit in Bielski, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:27 am by Marcel Pemsel
ART v OHIM (C-171/06 P): It is necessary, in any event, to reject T.I.M.E. [read post]