Search for: "LYNCH V DEFENSE"
Results 301 - 320
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Since Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
Since Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 10:05 am
In fact, the heightened standards of [Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Circuit Court of Appeals held in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:38 pm
See Smallwood v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
This post focuses on the Court's invalidation of Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.]In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Windsor (the challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act) – “are not as simple as whether gays and lesbians can marry or not, and whether they become eligible for federal benefits. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Lynch, 28 years before Carpenter was decided.In 1975, the Michigan legislature enacted a statute codifying the insanity defense. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
In New York, possession of a firearm is a criminal act, unless one holds a license to so possess, pursuant to Penal Law § 265.20(a)(3) and Article 400 (see People v Abdullah, 23 Misc 3d 232 [2008]; People v Zabar Lynch, 2008 NY Misc LEXIS 4587, 240 NYLJ 15 (July 15, 2008). [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:05 am
The Court of Appeals (Lynch, Lohier and Droney) disagrees. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm
See, e.g., Carras v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:09 am
The memo take great pains to emphasize that while the case was pending, the Second Circuit entered its opinion in Fait v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
And on the constitutional front, the focus in US v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Paul), and Lyons v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
D.C. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
The Act provides immunities and defenses for legitimate “patients” and “caregivers”, but pecuniary schemes like the one at issue in this casenote are clearly not protected by the MMMA.Compassionate Apothecary, a medical marijuana dispensary, or “provisioning center”, was the business model that underwent recent scrutiny by the Michigan Supreme Court in People v McQueen. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. [read post]
