Search for: "Label v Label" Results 301 - 320 of 13,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 8:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Overturning a nearly three-decade old legal precedent, a New York appellate court this week ruled that a statement labeling someone as gay cannot be defamatory per se.In the seven-page decision by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department in the case, Yonaty v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 4:48 pm
In a Federalist Society SCOTUScast, appellate lawyer Erin Glenn Busby discusses Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:42 pm
Label v Label 2010 NY Slip Op 08903 Decided on November 30, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department held that the lower court properly awarded wife attorneys fees for husband’s appeal of the parties’ matrimonial matter. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:01 pm by Walter James
The morning session was labeled "Day - Eight" - it should have been labeled as "Day - Seven - Morning Session. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:19 am by Eric Carpenter
She offers a different set of labels: foundation, bridge, and capstone. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:50 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
For example, 27 CFR 4.35(a)(2)(v) defines “vinted”—when used in the name/address statement on the label—to mean that “the named winery, at the stated address, subjected the wine to cellar treatment in accordance with §4.22(c). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:55 am
  The "what if" scenario actually happened in the case of Christoff v. [read post]