Search for: "Land v. Board of Education" Results 301 - 320 of 622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am by Eric Goldman
Yes, this is a 2016 case. * Board of Regents of the University of Houston System v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
"Last month, though, it landed in the 'fails to meet expectations' category on the latest round of state-issued report cards.... [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 14 conference)   Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But there are still a few federal Indian boarding schools operated by the Bureau of Indian Education, too, to serve Indian kids in far-flung locations. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Connecticut); (2) the government may not mandate speech in contravention of one’s religious belief (West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
One thing led to another and I finally landed a WC adjuster trainee job. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (Jurisdiction – Exhaustion of Tribal Court Remedies)Jamul Action Committee v Jonodev Chaudhuri (Indian Lands Eligible for Gaming)Tanner-Brown v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (Jurisdiction - Exhaustion of Tribal Court Remedies)Jamul Action Committee v Jonodev Chaudhuri (Indian Lands Eligible for Gaming)Tanner-Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
Board of Education – its very first decision applying the Establishment Clause to the states – explaining that the government may not exclude “Catholics, Lutherans, Mohammedans, Baptists, Jews, Methodists, Non-believers, Presbyterians, or the members of any other faith, because of their faith, or lack of it, from receiving the benefits of public welfare legislation. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Erika Bachiochi
The mistrust for opposing sides runs deep, with ill will presumed across the board. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
The Court also green-lighted National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
Especially when they are poor – as they disproportionately are – African Americans are more likely to be exposed to violence and crime, less likely to achieve a decent education and will have fewer employment opportunities, receive less adequate health care and face more violent interactions with the police. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:01 pm by Jason Rantanen
In Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]