Search for: "Law v. Wesley"
Results 301 - 320
of 462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 6:59 am
The case is Morey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm
From the intro: Leading off this week is a noncapital case from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Comm. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm
2011-1206 Whitserve LLC v Computer Packages, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:10 am
The Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Alhovsky v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:20 am
Officer Parker contacted an information technician at the LSC IT department, Wesley Parker. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
In its deliberations, the Grand Jury would examine whether a potential defendant had a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to prevent or terminate a burglary, and that inquiry would employ a "reasonableness standard" which has both objective and subjective elements (see People v Wesley, 76 NY2d 555, 559; People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96, 112). [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:10 am
In OW and OV v Members of the Board of the Wesley Mission Council, (NSWADT, Dec. 10, 2010), the Administrative Decisions Tribunal of the Australian state of New South Wales held that the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act does not require a religiously-sponsored social service organization to approve same-sex couples as foster care providers. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
Via Orin Kerr and John Wesley Hall, a California Court of Appeals held that night vision goggles are a constitutionally acceptable means of seeing what you couldn't otherwise see. in People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:17 am
The case is Goris v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:19 am
It's not 1980 anymore.The Court of Appeals (Parker, Wesley and Jones [D.J.]), rules there is no evidence that Congress intended to allow plaintiffs like Cenzon-DeCarlo to recover any remedies for the violation of this law. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Boston, MA: Pearson/Addison-Wesley, 2010. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:34 pm
Mata from Nebraska, and the other noncapital, Simmons v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:34 pm
John Wesley Hall, Jr., pegged Simmons when he noted it “is a remarkable opinion worthy of being a brief law review article itself considering the NLADA and ABA standards, cases considering “takings” of counsel’s time, counsel’s standing, and systemic ineffective assistance from a fee cap creating a disincentive for defense counsel to adequately perform in indigent criminal appeals. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:51 am
Portolatin v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:46 pm
The panel decision is United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am
Title: Simmons v. [read post]
