Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 301 - 320
of 268,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2008, 2:11 am
McGrath and Others v Riddell and Another House of Lords “The fact that in a country of principal winding-up of a company in liquidation there would be a class of preferential creditors who would not have priority under English insolvency law was insufficient reason for an English court to refuse to exercise its discretion, under section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986, to order remission of assets located in England to the country of principal winding-up. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:28 am
Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:54 am
Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd Queen’s Bench Division “It was not for the media to expose sexual conduct between consenting adults which did not involve any significant breach of the criminal law except where there was a countervailing public interest because at least one of the established limiting principles, such as victimisation or corruption of the young, came into play. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:34 am
Allison v London Underground Ltd Court of Appeal “The statutory requirement for an employer to provide adequate training for its employees imposed a higher duty than the common law duty which incorporated reasonable foreseeability; the statutory test was what training was needed in the light of what the employer ought to have known about the risks from the activities of its business. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
Horsham Properties Group Ltd v Clark and Another Chancery Division “The exercise of a statutory power of sale under section 101 of the Law of Property Act 1925 was not a deprivation of possessions for the purposes of article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, protecting the right to property. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:07 am
GAB Robins (UK) Ltd v Triggs Court of Appeal “In a case of unfair constructive dismissal, where there was a gap in time between the employer's repudiatory breach and the employee's acceptance of it by resignation, damages for the loss caused by the repudiatory breach could not be claimed in unfair dismissal proceedings before an industrial tribunal and had to be sought in separate common law proceedings. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:39 am
Regina (Gentle and Another) v Prime Minister and Others House of Lords “The British Government did not owe a duty to British troops and their families, under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to hold a public inquiry into whether it had obtained adequate legal advice on the legality in international law of the invasion of Iraq before the invasion. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 3:08 am
Ingredients of safety at work offence by officer Regina v P Ltd and Another “An offence was committed by an officer of a body corporate which broke health and safety laws through his behaviour if he either knew of the relevant facts giving rise to the offence, or if he did not know, should by reason of the circumstances, have been put on inquiry as to whether the relevant safety procedures were in place. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 11:13 am
Schedule I drugs include almost all illegal drugs, while Schedule V drugs are the least addicting, such as some cough medicines. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 6:48 am
Regina (Heffernan) v Rent Service House of Lords "Rent officers should not base a local reference rent on too large an area. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:41 am
Call for Papers: International Law and Domestic Law-Making Processes University of Basel, Law Faculty, 4 September 2015 An upcoming event of the Working Group of Young Scholars in Public International Law (Arbeitskreis junger Völkerrechtswissenschaftler*innen, AjV) wants to shed light on selected problems connected with the interaction of domestic law-making and international law. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 am
Case: Brady v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:58 am
Case: Baron v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:00 am
Dukes symposium at Point of Law (1) Update: “Apple wins appeal over alleged iPod hearing loss” (2) Ted on the SEC and Stoneridge (3) Ted Frank on the Dukes v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
When I read Padilla v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
Nevertheless, the “single meaning” rule has been well established in the law for two hundred years and was endorsed by the House of Lords in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 5:21 pm
From colleagues at Southern Univeristy: SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW: CALL FOR PAPERSThe Southern University Law Review is excited to announce its 2017 symposium titled "Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures after Utah v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:07 am
Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corporation and Others Queen’s Bench Division “An internet search engine was not a publisher at common law. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 11:51 am
Blue Diamond My 2018 Comments to the FDA The post Louisiana’s Anti-Vegan Law Constitutionally Enjoined–Tofurky v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:18 am
CNN, Inc., 2022 WL 3334716 (SDNY Aug. 12, 2022) The post Retweets ≠ Endorsements (As a Matter of Law)–Flynn v. [read post]
