Search for: "League v. League"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2020, 10:00 am
However, the case Shaw v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:59 am
Michael McCann (Vermont Law School) has posted American Needle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
In South Yuba River Citizens League v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 7:34 am
USA Football, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:34 pm
In the 1963 case of AFL v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:53 am
Recently in the Bronx Times, the Wakefield Taxpayers and Civic League (for more about who they are, look here) mentioned Bronx Community Solutions in their weekly column on community conditions, complied by Mary V. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 4:05 am
In League of Residential Neighborhood Advocates v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
This is set out in more detail in the first Judgment and Order granted by Arnold J during the last football season, in favour of the FA Premier League and discussed by Eleonora on the IPKat here) with the second Order being a further Order in favour for FAPL, granted in July on a new application for the current season (Arnold J's judgement in the second case appears to be unavailable on free sources but the case, FAPL v BT II; [2017] EWHC 1877… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
Former New Zealand test cricketer Chris Cairns has succeeded in his “Twitter libel” claim against the former Chairman of the Indian Premier League, Lalit Modi. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:02 am
In his recent decision in the case of DeAngelo v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Guest post by Summer Associate Kristen Schalter Football players took another hit in Tallahassee (pun intended) – this time in the workers’ compensation arena in the recent decision in Arena Football League v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Guest post by Summer Associate Kristen Schalter Football players took another hit in Tallahassee (pun intended) – this time in the workers’ compensation arena in the recent decision in Arena Football League v. [read post]
Federal Court of Appeal’s Decision in Mohr Provides Guidance Under Section 48 of the Competition Act
25 Aug 2022, 12:37 pm
C-34 (conspiracies relating to professional sport) applies only to conspiracies between professional sports teams and clubs in the same league (see Mohr v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
The second case we consider is U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:45 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Home Box Office v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:18 pm
In a short sua sponte merits decision, the New York Court of Appeals in Roberts v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:49 am
In re: Teligent, Incorporated, Debtor v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:21 am
The high court discouraged the use of "Pearl Harbor-like" plans by board factions to disenfranchise other directors and chided the chancery court for labeling large stockholders as "super directors" (OptimisCorp v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
The 1953 case at the Court, Toolson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:57 am
We all read Marbury v. [read post]
