Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers"
Results 301 - 320
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2012, 3:36 am
[iv]Juilliard v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:18 am
Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:56 am
Sara Designs, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am
USA Today’s Joan Biskupic explores the impact of Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
"June 25, 2009 - 2 PM: Otto International, Inc. v. [read post]
Lord Coke Completes His Come-Back; First Sale of Works Anywhere Defeats Copyright Claim, Court Holds
19 Mar 2013, 7:05 pm
In that case, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:36 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:07 am
Triumph Learning LLC, Opposition No. 91170112 [Opposition to registration of the marks COACH and COACH AMERICA'S BEST FOR STUDENT SUCCESS & Design for various educational materials on the grounds of mere descriptiveness and of likelihood of confusion with and dilution of the mark COACH registered for leather goods and various other products].February 25, 2010 - 11 AM: Mag Instrument, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
Marks applied for by Burlington Fashion GmbhProtection was sought in relation to the following classes:Class 3, including soaps for cosmetic purposes;Class 14, including jewellery and watches;Class 18, including leather and leather products; and Class 25, including footwear, clothing, headgear and belts.In response, Tulliallan submitted notices of opposition between August 2009 and August 2010 in respect of the goods in classes 3, 14 and 18. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:51 am
Dita, Inc., Oppositions Nos. 91167828 and 91170265 [Section 2(d) consolidated opposition to registration of DITA for jewelry, leather goods, and clothing, based on the alleged prior use of the identical mark and the mark DITA DE LEON for the same "categories" of goods].August 25, 2011 - 2 PM: Ahold Licensing, S.A. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:19 pm
In Lockheed v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:14 am
Relying on Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:47 am
Leathers, 475 So.2d 1329, 1330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:59 am
Grants Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
The case is O’Sullivan Films v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
The case is O’Sullivan Films v. [read post]
