Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure" Results 301 - 320 of 672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others, heard 13 – 14 April 2011. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others, heard 13 – 14 April 2011. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
I Will UK industry suffer from Government's "ratify now, repent at leisure" UPC stance? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark consisting of a two-dimensional… [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:14 am by Apeng
EU free trade and copyright laws allow use of foreign decoders in pubs, rules ECJ: Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure / ??????????????????????????????? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your… [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
And human beings have to deal with the problem of excess leisure...I am afraid that the long term future we are building will have no space left for human beings...a world where we have these robots and better and better artificial intelligence, where systematically those systems replace humans, human services, human work...Is it a good or bad thing if robots become our natural successors and we fade into extinction? [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:34 am by Andres
Similarly, in the CJEU case of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure concluded that football matches themselves are not protected by copyright; US law has a similar result in NBA v Motorola. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm by Graham Smith
FAPL v QC Leisure [2008] EWHC 1411 (Ch) and ITV v TV Catchup [2011] EWHC 1874 (Pat)). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:16 pm by michael
My last post pointed to a Columbus Bar Association press release about Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:35 am by Kevin Jackson
In 2012, the California Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated opinion in Brinker Restaurant Corporation, et al. v. [read post]