Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 301 - 320
of 672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 7:14 pm
(Legislature v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:22 am
So Ms Murphy herself could use the Greek service and her criminal conviction was overturned by the High Court.But neither CJEU nor the High Court directly resolved the wider issue of copyright infringement in those elements of the matches that could be protected by the Premier League - logos and graphics, the the league's anthem and pre-recorded and edited short films from earlier matches used in live broadcasts - and the CJEU noted that when these were shown in public - and the transmission in… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:46 pm
Gill explains:As a postscript to this 1709 Blog post late last year on Scottish Professional Football League Limited (SPFL) v Lisini Pub Management Co Limited (2013) CSIH 97 -- this being the Scottish version of Football Association Premier League Limited and Others v QC Leisure and Others (No. 2), a.k.a the FAPL case -- the Scottish Appeal Court decided last week to refuse leave to appeal to the UK Supreme Court.To recap: SPFL’s appeal of the first instance… [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
While the parties' respective trading activities happen to be quite different right now, business models change from time to time as opportunities, leisure activities and technological convergence evolve. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:34 pm
See Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
The 140ha precinct, between Gateway and uMhlanga Village, was launched five years ago.Deighton said that the 42ha site being sold was part of the 62ha remaining in Ridgeside.The transaction formed part of Tongaat Hulett's new mega-property transaction approach, intended to boost market competition and contribute to greater economic growth and investment in Durban.It was aimed at luring large national and international property players to invest in the city.Deighton said that compared with other… [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
” Baures v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:50 am
In this week’s case (Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
Does the recent case of Warner v Armfield Retail & Leisure Ltd change how an employer should react? [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 12:09 pm
See World Help v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:04 am
This change effectively codifies the approach adopted by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgment in Parkwood Leisure v Alemo-Herron (C-426/11)[3] [insert case link]. 2. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:22 am
The case I am referring to is the opinion released yesterday by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal: Wallace et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
It was held that holidays are designed to be a period of “relaxation and leisure”, whilst sick leave is designed to enable the worker to recover from an illness. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:50 am
Leisure Pro, Ltd., 8:08-cv-2191-T-33MAP, 2009 WL 1066249, at *1 (M.D. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 6:29 am
The case is a 1999, Tyler Court of Appeals case styled, Dunn v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:31 pm
In Hirst v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
In Headifen v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:56 am
Fire in haste, repent in leisure. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:45 am
This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
The European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) has handed down its judgment in a key, long-running TUPE case – Alemo-Herron v Parkwood Leisure Ltd. [read post]
