Search for: "Lemley v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley: sounds like we need a TM use doctrine! [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fully litigated prior restraints presumptively unconstitutional—Near v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Attempts to give certainty—but sometimes what you think is a clear definition becomes more complex, as in Apple v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Lemley et al., Life After Bilski, 63 Stan. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:47 am by Michael Carrier
” The second reason the Court should hear the case is to ensure the viability of the important antitrust case of Verizon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley: think about mental state and the negligence analogy. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Jeanne Fromer Private actors pursue their own interests. [read post]