Search for: "Li v. O"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,053
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
I hope the following links, excerpts, comments, and reflections (in no particular order) will prove of interest for one reason or another to our readers. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 6 November 2019 Nicklin J heard the assessment of damages in the case of Chandler v O’Connor. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
Frank O. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
" "[O]ver the past ten years, approximately 25 defendants [have apparently been] charged under the criminal defamation statute. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:44 am
” In a message that Juror-12 later deleted, Juror-12 responded that “[n]o one will testify against her! [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 11:14 pm
The double curse was at work in Roy Food and Wine LLC v Meregalli, 2019 NY Slip Op 32875(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 25, 2019], decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice O. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Writing for a majority of the Court, Justice O’Connor in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Décision Le terrain où se trouvent les installations visées est une propriété publique fédérale au sens de l’article 91 paragraphe 1A de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867 et les activités d’IMTT sont étroitement liées à la compétence fédérale sur la navigation et les bâtiments ou navires, mais il ne s’agit pas d’une entreprise de transport… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
P. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 10:57 am
Butler & V. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
O’Brien[v] might have been caused by his worry that aggressive judicial patrolling of congressional motivation or of incidental effects on speech would produce too many challenges and thus strain judicial capacity, as Coan posits, but it might instead have been the product of an aversion to non-linguistic anti-war protests, an aversion that would explain Warren’s dissent in Street v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 6:59 am
Common Cause that the issue lies outside the reach of federal courts. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:23 pm
Similarly, in Kita v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
But her only hope lies with her Court or Congress to fix this eligibility problem. [read post]
