Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 301 - 320
of 21,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 2:21 pm
We know the laws and regulations that govern theme parks in Florida and have the experience needed to investigate roller coaster accidents, identify who is liable, gather pertinent evidence, and build the strongest possible case on our client’s behalf. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
” While there’s no reason Section 230 couldn’t apply to digital items sold by the defendant, I don’t see how 230 can apply equally to offline physical items. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
This is a higher standard of proof of misconduct that the defendant must show in a personal injury negligence case against a non-governmental defendant. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 11:00 pm
Plaintiffs asserted that defendant healthcare organization inadequately protected the personal and health information of visitors to defendant’s website. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
” Indeed, the court cited with approval another court’s statement that “it appears difficult for a defendant, innocent or not, to defend himself in a claim for disgorgement of profits. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The defendant is domiciled in Spain and offered diving accessories, inter alia, on www.amazon.de using the plaintiff’s trade marks. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Under agency law, employers are typically not liable for the torts of independent contractors, unless the work involved is “inherently dangerous. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
CASE THROWN OUT BECAUSE IT WASN’T THE DEFENDANT’S CARAfter a personal injury lawsuit was filed against Pasha Enterprises Corp, the defendant moved for pre-trial relief in its favor (via a motion for summary judgment). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am
Here, the plaintiff’s allegations that the defendants hid true facts and acted to benefit themselves are conclusory and factually insufficient (see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 787; Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly, 191 AD3d at 762). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:28 pm
Identifying all potentially liable parties is more complex in truck accidents. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:19 am
Both claimants were jointly liable as Mr Hickmet was either acting in his own capacity or as agent for Cheerz Express at all times. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm
As a result, a patient’s failure to recognize a medication error may bar a damages award. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
If you bring a lawsuit after a chain-reaction accident on a bridge or highway, you must prove that the defendant’s negligence was the factual and legal cause of your injuries. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:42 am
Plaintiffs must prove their case by the preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that the defendant’s negligence led to the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:11 am
The office said: [C]ontrary to defendants’ argument, there is a substantial risk that defendants will attempt to evade enforcement of the judgment (or make enforcement more difficult) following appeal. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:12 pm
The plaintiff further contended that the defendant’s employer, the company for which the defendant was working during the collision, should also be held liable. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm
Alito characterized Fletcher’s response – that they too could be held criminally liable – as “disturbing. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:39 pm
The Aluma court stated: “The determination of whether in a specific case the defendant will be held liable to a third person not in privity is a matter of policy and involves the balancing of several factors: (1) the extent to which the transaction was intended to affect the plaintiff; (2) the foreseeability of harm to him; (3) the degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury; and (4) the closeness of the connection between the… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
And it is enough that the program's "broad topic" is of public concern. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Both when enacted and in subsequent litigation, the Alien Enemies Act’s proponents defended its constitutionality on the ground that the “rules of war under the laws of nations” rendered a belligerent’s citizens “liable to be treated as prisoners of war” and thus subject to detention or deportation. [read post]
