Search for: "Little v. Ives" Results 301 - 320 of 1,634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
This Kat finds that, as a patent attorney, just as in his previous life as a chemist, there is little about his day job that overlaps with anything that his non-IP friends have ever heard of. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
  Let's say, for example, a guy with mental health issues commits a plethora of serious offenses -- e.g., whacking a ton of people with a baseball bat -- and we're convinced that if he's released, he's going to do the same thing again, this time to a bunch of little kids. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
The case is Winkler v Gates, better known as the Boy Scout Jamboree case.First, here's a little background on the issue. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:34 am by INFORRM
In reaching this figure, the Tribunal took into account the following factors: (i) the magazine’s circulation (470,000 copies); (ii) the intrusive nature of the article; (iii) the use of long-lens photography; (iv) the information volunteered by Ms Gayet about her personal and family life in previous interviews prior to 2008; (v) Ms Gayet’s efforts to keep her personal life out of the press since 2008; (vi) the ‘paparazzi hunt’ which Ms Gayet had been the… [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 1:55 pm by familoo
It’s a little known thing that under rule 46.5 of the Civil Procedure Rules (which do apply to family proceedings – see FPR 28.2) the court may award a litigant in person their costs. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
The effort and expense of producing electronic material dwarf any corresponding return from plaintiffs with little, if anything, to produce in response. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
That was more than a little premature. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
That was more than a little premature. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
After discussing all submitted evidence anew, Lord Justice Kitchin determined that the evidence did indeed create a likelihood of confusion, however acknowledging some of it having little probative value. [read post]