Search for: "Little v. King"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb Leon: The Professional Memento American History X North by Northwest Saving Private Ryan Alien Spirited Away The Shining A Clockwork Orange The Prestige Singin’ in the Rain Pan’s Labyrinth Oldboy Unforgiven Inglourious Basterds The Lion King Sin City Blade Runner Toy Story The Big Lebowski The Wizard of Oz Cool Hand Luke Strangers on a Train Gone with the Wind Life of Brian Monty Python and the Holy Grail Groundhog… [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, and joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, found that the ACA phrase “an Exchange established by the state” did not expressly limit tax credits to state Exchanges, as alleged by the petitioners, but was properly viewed as ambiguous and that several other provisions in the ACA would make little sense if tax credits were not available to federal Exchange enrollees (King v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
Back at the hotel, I downloaded the complaint (the TRO motion was filed a little later). [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:24 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:45 pm
The British Columbia Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ram v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Accordingly, the court concluded that the district court did not err in granting the officers summary judgment based on qualified immunity, in granting official immunity to all defendants, and dismissing the state-law claims.Read More: 8th Circuit upholds decision for North Little Rock police in hypothermia deathDean v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:15 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
” Charles V Let’s take a little detour here: Did that say doubloon? [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* Hospira v Genentech Mark 1, the AppealThe dispute between Hospira and Genentech in the UK courts is getting a little confusing. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
Back in January, we put up a short post noting the filing of a petition for extraordinary ("King's Bench") review in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am
King began his crusade, the landmark Supreme Court cases the Dred Scott Decision (1857) and Plessy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 78 (1984). [8] See infra note 34. [9] See, e.g., State by McClure v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 12:25 pm
LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:06 am
I hadn’t intended to write again so recently about emergency medicine malpractice, but last week Walter Olson sent WhiteCoat the opinion in King v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
Briefly: Bloomberg TV has an explainer on Kirby v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
Cahn v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
Miscellaneous * Colleen Chien, Of Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-Tech Patents, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 87, 2009 * Mazur v. eBay Inc., 2009 WL 1203937 (N.D. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:30 am
To load the counterpoint as “jargon advocacy” is a little dickish, but that’s why there are cats willing to look upon kings like Posner. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 4:39 am
The IPKat notes the following:* The Patents Court was sitting as a Community Design Court.* At para. 24 Lewison J says:"There is little guidance from decided cases about how the Regulation is to be interpreted. ... since the Regulation applies across the whole European Union, it is desirable for there to be consistency of interpretation across all member states. [read post]
