Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 301 - 320
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
Under California divorce law, a ten-year-long marriage is considered a “marriage of long duration. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am
Phonographic Performance Limited v Fletcher is an extempore ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last Monday; being extempore it isn't available on BAILII but it was noted in brief on the subscription-only Lawtel service. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Arnold v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:59 am
The Supreme Court in Arnold v Britton declined to bend the usual rules of construction in favour of the tenants of holiday chalets let on long leases. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:49 am
Arnold that an explanation of reasons must be included in a Rule 137 order whether or not sanctions are imposed. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
It's time to celebrate reaching another memorable if admittedly arbitrary milestone in the IPKat's long and endless trek through the wonderful world of intellectual property. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This is a reference from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, on an appeal from the Trade Mark Registry. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 902 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a majority of 4-1 in the case concerning the true interpretation of 5 versions of a clause which has been described as a service charge clause in the long lease agreement of 25 chalets in the respondent’s leisure park. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:37 am
Supreme Court decision in Hoffman v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In the case of R 5/14 the Petitioner had a long list of complaints against a Board of Appeal, but no real chance of success. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Troxel v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
” The distinction between “general” and “specific” was considered by the CJEU in the eBay case and subsequently by the High Court in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v British Telecommunications Plc ([2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch)) in which Arnold J held that an order intended to block access by BT’s subscribers to a particular website involved in copyright infringement did not fall foul of Article 15. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am
MICHAEL ARNOLD, JANET ARNOLD, STEVE SOUTH AS TRUSTEE AND ON BEHALF OF THE SOUTH LIVING TRUST, JOHN S. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
Pepper Bottling Co. of Texas, Inc., 416 F.Supp.2d 497, 504 (N.D.Tex. 2006); Arnold D. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:06 pm
V-I. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:26 am
Reiff, 14 Misc 2d 37, 39, 41-42; Long Is. [read post]