Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 301 - 320 of 603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
  Under California divorce law, a ten-year-long marriage is considered a “marriage of long duration. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am by Jeremy
Phonographic Performance Limited v Fletcher is an extempore ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last Monday; being extempore it isn't available on BAILII but it was noted in brief on the subscription-only Lawtel service. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:59 am by Siobhan Hayes and Sarah Frost
  The Supreme Court in Arnold v Britton declined to bend the usual rules of construction in favour of the tenants of holiday chalets let on long leases. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:49 am by Kirk Jenkins
Arnold that an explanation of reasons must be included in a Rule 137 order whether or not sanctions are imposed. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
It's time to celebrate reaching another memorable if admittedly arbitrary milestone in the IPKat's long and endless trek through the wonderful world of intellectual property. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This is a reference from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, on an appeal from the Trade Mark Registry. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 902 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a majority of 4-1 in the case concerning the true interpretation of 5 versions of a clause which has been described as a service charge clause in the long lease agreement of 25 chalets in the respondent’s leisure park. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In the case of R 5/14 the Petitioner had a long list of complaints against a Board of Appeal, but no real chance of success. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
” The distinction between “general” and “specific” was considered by the CJEU in the eBay case and subsequently by the High Court in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v British Telecommunications Plc ([2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch)) in which Arnold J held that an order intended to block access by BT’s subscribers to a particular website involved in copyright infringement did not fall foul of Article 15. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
MICHAEL ARNOLD, JANET ARNOLD, STEVE SOUTH AS TRUSTEE AND ON BEHALF OF THE SOUTH LIVING TRUST, JOHN S. [read post]